Q1. “The end may be noble, but the means must also be just.” Discuss the ethical significance of this statement with examples from public life.
ANS.
“Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.”— Potter Stewart
Means and ends pose one of the greatest ethical dilemmas in public life. There are two philosophies-utilitarian and Kantian which provide the logic of why action should be end-oriented or means-oriented.
Nobel Ends but means compromised: There can be several situation in which because of noble end, means are compromised.
-
- Jeremy Bentham supports actions that result in the “greatest happiness for the greatest number.”
- Example: Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings (1945): The US dropped atomic bombs to force Japan’s surrender, ending WWII.
- Example: Bulldozer action, encounter policy, internet ban, etc all may have right causes but often means are compromised. Bulldozer action “lawless” and “ruthless” SC in 2025.
Means based: Immanuel Kant asserts “Act only on that maxim which you can will to be a universal law.”
Example: IRS Officer Shreelekha Mukherjee’s Stand Against Political Pressure-refused to favour influential individuals in tax proceedings despite pressure.
Example: Lal Bahadur Shastri’s resignation as Railway Minister after a train accident.
Although they can be relevant in their own context, but there cannot be separation between both. “As the means, so the end. There is no wall between the two.” – Mahatma Gandhi.
In public life, a public servant is not only concern about outcome of the action but also the rightness of the action. Action must not only be lawful but also just. Public servant is guided by conduct rules as well as conscience.
|
Suman Nala, IPS: Catalyst for Change – Kodarvi Tribal Rehabilitation While conversing with her domestic cook, Alka, Suman sensitively asked about her family’s village (‘sasural’). Alka shared that her Kodarvi community had been socially exiled from Mota Pipodara village in Banaskantha since 2014 due to a tribal punitive practice known as ‘Chadotaru’. Touched by this personal story, Suman initiated an investigation—even as a probationer ASP in Danta division. She opted for reconciliation over enforcement, engaging local panchayats and tribal elders in structured dialogue. To facilitate their return, Suman marshaled ₹70 lakh, combining government and NGO funds. Thirty homes are underway and community infrastructure is being rebuilt. Today, about 300 displaced Kodarvi tribals have returned with dignity. |
Suman could have used force to rehabilitate Kodarvi tribe but she chose a dialogical and compassionate approach to achieve noble end.
Similarly, SC recently(July 2025)in one case, instead of pronouncing legal action against IPS woman who falsely implicated her husband and in-laws, the court went for moral restitution and asked her to publicly apologise.
It is not only deontology which gives emphasis on means of action but also Virtue ethics which advocates doctrine of means.
Conclusion:
It is essential to guide one’s action by both means and ends, even if in some situation, either one has to be given preference. “Means are like seeds, ends like the tree.”-Gandhi.
Q2. “Technology is value-neutral; morality resides solely within its creator or user.” Evaluate and illustrate with reference to contemporary technologies.
ANS.
“Technology should serve humanity, not the reverse.” – Amartya Sen.
There are two views on technology whether it is value-neutral or not, they are as follows:
| Technology is value-neutral | Technology is as not value-neutral |
|---|---|
| • It depends on those who use technology-positive or negative • Social media, nuclear weapon, knife-how people use. • This results into people being made sensitive and aware, so that they can apply technology sensitively. • Data ethics, code of ethics, global cooperation, arms treaties etc. • NITI Aayog 10 principles of responsible |
1. There can be design bias-algorithm bias 2. Technologies are also built for power advantage 3. Algorithmic Bias: AI trained on biased datasets may discriminate against race, gender, caste. 4. Example: COMPAS software in the U.S. criminal justice system. 5. Example: Pegasus is created for state surveillance |
Initially, it was viewed that technology was neutral and it depended on human-instrumentalist view. But today, this view has been discarded. “Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.” – Melvin Kranzberg (First Law of Technology).
| Technology | Why Not Neutral | Key Ethical Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Policing | Biased data | Discrimination |
| Facial Recognition | Racial/gender bias | Privacy, profiling |
| Social Media Algorithms | Engagement-maximizing | Misinformation |
| Deepfakes | Fabricated reality | Consent, truth |
| Autonomous Weapons | Lacks human control | Accountability |
| Surveillance Tools | Mass monitoring | Civil liberties |
Philosophically:
-
- Immanuel Kant says ethics lies in intention. If creators or users act with goodwill and respect for human dignity, use of tech is moral.
- Langdon Winner says technologies have politics — they can reinforce power structures and are not always neutral.
“We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.” – Marshall McLuhan
Conclusion:
Technology may begin as a neutral tool, but its design, deployment, and impact are value-laden. The moral compass guiding its use must include ethical foresight, inclusive design, and public accountability. “We can no longer separate technological development from moral judgment.” –Prof. Martha Nussbaum.
Spread the Word
The post Question and Answer appeared first on Lukmaan IAS.