USA ATTACKS VENEZUELA

USA ATTACKS VENEZUELA

Why in News?

• ON 3 JANUARY 2026, The United States launched large-scale military strikes on Venezuela and claimed to have captured Nicolás Maduro, along with his wife Cilia Flores.
• The operation marks the most direct US military intervention in Venezuela in decades.
• The action has raised serious questions about international law, sovereignty, and regional stability

WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED?

• In the early hours of Saturday, US aircraft struck military targets in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital.
• Explosions were reported across the city, and power outages affected several areas.
• US special forces reportedly seized Maduro and Cilia Flores, transported them to a US Navy ship offshore, and then flew them to the United States.
• Maduro is currently being held at a federal detention facility in New York.
• He is expected to face charges including narco-terrorism conspiracy.

US GOVERNMENT’S ANNOUNCEMENT

• Donald Trump announced the operation on social media.
• He stated that the US would temporarily “run the country” until a “safe, proper, and judicious transition” is arranged
• The US described the action as necessary to dismantle a “narco-terrorist regime.”

WHY DID THE US TARGET NICOLAS MADURO NOW?

• The Trump administration has long accused Maduro of leading a criminal state apparatus involved in drug trafficking to the US
• Washington claims Maduro heads the so-called “Cartel of the Suns”, a drug-trafficking network.
• The US has also accused Maduro of rigging Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election to remain in power.
• In recent months, the US increased pressure through:
  • Expanded economic sanctions,
  • Seizure of Venezuelan oil tankers, and
  • Military build-up in the Caribbean.
• The capture followed weeks of public calls by Trump for Maduro to step down.

IS OIL A CENTRAL FACTOR?

• Oil appears to be a key strategic factor behind the operation.
• Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves.
• President Trump stated that American oil companies would return to Venezuela to rebuild its energy sector.
• He said US involvement would be financed by revenues from oil production.
• Venezuela and several international critics accused the US of using oil interests as the real motive.
• The episode revived comparisons with past US interventions in Iraq and the Middle East.

WHO IS INCHARGE OF VENEZUELA NOW?

• The situation inside Venezuela remains unclear and unstable.
• Venezuelan authorities described the capture as a “kidnapping”.
• Vice President Delcy Rodríguez appeared on state television condemning the US action.
• A Venezuelan court named her interim president.
• The government declared a “state of external disturbance”, granting expanded powers to the armed forces.
• Soldiers and pro-government militias were deployed across parts of Caracas.

LEGAL & CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS

• International law experts have questioned the legality of seizing a sitting foreign head of state without:
  • A declared war, or
  • A United Nations mandate.
• In the US, lawmakers from both parties demanded explanations.
• Republican Senator Mike Lee sought constitutional justification for the strikes.
• Democrats accused the administration of misleading Congress during briefings.

INTERNATIONAL REACTION

• The United Nations Secretary-General called the action a “dangerous precedent.”
• An emergency UN Security Council meeting was scheduled.
• Russia and China strongly condemned the US action as a violation of sovereignty.
• Venezuela’s allies including Iran and Cuba also criticised the strikes.
• Colombia called for urgent diplomatic consultations.

REACTION INSIDE VENEZUELA

• Inside Venezuela, public reaction was deeply divided.
• Some citizens expressed fear and uncertainty amid military deployment.
• Others celebrated what they viewed as the end of an authoritarian regime.
• Venezuelan migrants across Latin America and other regions held spontaneous celebrations.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

• Several critical questions remain unanswered:
  • Will the US conduct further military operations?
  • How will a political transition be managed?
  • Will US ground troops be deployed?
• Trump said he is open to deploying ground forces if required.
• Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that no further action is planned for now.
• With no stable authority in Caracas and global powers divided, the risk of prolonged instability remains high.

DOMESTIC POLITICAL IMPACT IN USA

• The intervention carries political risks for President Trump.
• The episode comes ahead of US midterm elections.
• Opinion polls suggest American voters are more concerned about inflation and economic issues than foreign military interventions.

CONCLUSION

• The US attack on Venezuela represents a major escalation in international intervention.
• While the US frames it as a law-enforcement and security action, critics see it as a violation of sovereignty driven by strategic interests.
• The incident may reshape Latin American geopolitics, strain global power relations, and test international legal norms
• The future of Venezuela now depends on how the transition is managed amid deep internal and external divisions.

Note: Connect with Vajirao & Reddy Institute to keep yourself updated with latest UPSC Current Affairs in English.

Note: We upload Current Affairs Except Sunday.

The post USA ATTACKS VENEZUELA appeared first on Vajirao IAS.